Legal Opinion

Silvadnie Quainoo v. Jennifer Denise Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 26, 2015No. 14-12690UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case, following a jury trial, Defendants Jennifer Watkins and Hunter Aldridge appeal the district court’s denial of their renewed motion' for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial and the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to Plaintiff Silvadnie Quainoo. Plaintiff Quainoo cross-appeals the district court’s denial of her renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial. After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Popham v. City of KennesawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. FURMAN v. CHERRYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2019
  2. Hall v. Butler (INMATE 1)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023
  3. Patricia Eads v. City of Collinsville & Village of MaryvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025
  4. SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Holdings, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API