Gould v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.
New York Supreme Court
Demtjbbeb to answer.
1Opinion of the CourtBeekmau, J.
This action is brought for a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant to reconnect the electric light appliances in plaintiff’s apartments with the conductors of the defendant and to resume supplying the plaintiff with electric light. Damages to the extent of $500 are also demanded for the refusal of the defendant to comply with plaintiff’s demand for such service. An answer has been interposed which, among others, contains what is described as a second and separate defense to the amended complaint. To this the plaintiff has demurred for insufficiency. Without undertaking to state in full…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- Grandin v. Le Roy & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Lough v. . OuterbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1974
- State ex rel. W. J. Armstrong Co. v. City of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Goldberg v. KirschsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Moore v. Champlain Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Mykolin v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1976