Legal Opinion

Mykolin v. Consolidated Edison Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold Guy Fraiman, J.

In this action for a judgment declaring that the minimum charge for residential customers of defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York (Con Edison) is illegal because it violates subdivision 6 of section 65 of the Public Service Law, plaintiffs move for an order pursuant to CPLR article 9 permitting them to maintain the action as a class action. Con Edison cross-moves for summary judgment on the ground that the cause of action has no merit, and that the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, and on other related grounds. Following oral argument on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. City of Rochester v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. District of Columbia v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API