Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lynn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1911No. 21,650Published

From Putnam Circuit Court; John M. Bawley, Judge. Action by Robert R. Lynn against tbe Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Myers, J.

The able counsel for appellant have presented a brief on petition for a rehearing, in which their position on the “look and listen” rule is much more clearly presented than in their original brief, their contention being that by the original opinion in the case, the rule of look and listen is abrogated, and if that reasonably can be said to be its construction or effect, their position is well taken, though the court had no idea of that bind, or no suspicion of that construction or effect, because we recognize the rule in all its established force, and had…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API