Legal Opinion
Boney v. Retzer Resources Inc
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 16, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00077Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MARTHA CAROL BONEY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:23-cv-00077 KGB RETZER RESOURCES, INC. DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Retzer Resources, Inc. (“Retzer”) (Dkt. No. 15). Plaintiff Martha Carol Boney responded in opposition to the motion, and Retzer filed a reply (Dkt. Nos. 21; 24). For the following reasons, the Court grants Retzer’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 15). I. Background Unless otherwise specified, the Court draws the following facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Prudential Insurance Company v. Curtis R. Hinkel, Appellant/cross-Appellee, Anna Hinkel, a Minor, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.