Legal Opinion

Newell v. Department of Mental Retardation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 20, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

In Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 600 (2001) (Buckhannon), the United States Supreme Court ruled that “a party that has failed to secure a judgment on the merits or a court-ordered consent decree, but has nonetheless achieved the desired result because the lawsuit brought about a voluntary change in the defendant’s conduct” is not a “prevailing party” for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees under Federal fee-shifting statutes allowing such awards. The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000),…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. T & D Video, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CoutuMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  3. LaChance v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Parker v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Driscoll v. Providence Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API