Newell v. Department of Mental Retardation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
In Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 600 (2001) (Buckhannon), the United States Supreme Court ruled that “a party that has failed to secure a judgment on the merits or a court-ordered consent decree, but has nonetheless achieved the desired result because the lawsuit brought about a voluntary change in the defendant’s conduct” is not a “prevailing party” for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees under Federal fee-shifting statutes allowing such awards. The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000),…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- T & D Video, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CoutuMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- LaChance v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Parker v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Driscoll v. Providence Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.