Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Menz v. State Teachers Retirement Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2015No. 2014-1240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the Tenth District Court of Appeals’ decision in this appeal of a mandamus case. Respondent-appellant, State Teachers Retirement Board *27(“STRB”), denied the application of relator-appellee, Jason Menz, for disability-retirement benefits because, it asserts, he did not meet the criteria for permanent disability. Menz filed an action in mandamus in the Tenth District, and that court held that STRB had abused its discretion because both the treating physician and the independent physician had acknowledged that Menz had a condition that would prevent his return to work for at least…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McMaster v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Kolcinko v. Ohio Police & Fire Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Moss v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Pontillo v. Public Employees Retirement System BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ewart v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State ex rel Bryan v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State ex rel. Hayslip v. State Teachers Ret. Sys. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Parker v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API