Legal Opinion

People v. Keene

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur J. Cooperman, J.

*882By order dated June 25, 2001, this court denied defendant’s pro se motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) seeking DNA testing of certain evidence. Upon reargument, the court adhered to its original decision on July 31, 2001.

On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the court’s order of July 31, 2001, and remitted the matter for a hearing to determine whether the physical evidence is still in existence and, if so, whether the evidence contains sufficient DNA material for testing (People v Keene, 4 AD3d 536 [2d Dept 2004]).

Factual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. PittsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. KeeneNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. KeeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. People v. KeeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BarnwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Allen v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API