Legal Opinion

Gunstone v. Walker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1930No. 22401. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Upon the theory that a resulting trust arose by reason of the following alleged facts, this action was brought to compel the defendants to execute to the plaintiffs a quitclaim deed for an- undivided one-half interest in a parcel of real property used as a dumping ground:

John Grunstone and James E. Walker orally agreed to purchase from the Olympia Brewing Company a tract of land. It was understood that each of the parties was to have an undivided one-half interest in the property; that Grunstone’s payment of one-half of the purchase price would be effected by cancellation of Walker’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norton v. BrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Langan v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Funk v. HenslerWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Rand v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Criss v. BitzegaioIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API