Legal Opinion

Knisel v. Oaks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1994No. 1815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

At issue in this appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s order denying the petition of appellants Randy Oaks and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) to enforce a settlement allegedly reached with appellees William A. Knisel, Jr., and Doris J. Knisel, administrators of the estate of their daughter, Michele M! Knisel, who died as the result of injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Having concluded, after careful analysis, that the order in question is not final and appealable, we are constrained to quash the appeal.

■ The facts of the case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Valley View Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Viola v. BocherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Cisneros, A. v. Rouse, F. D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. B.L.R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API