Legal Opinion

Martin A. Thomson v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and Department of the Navy, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 11, 1985No. Appeal 84-1410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is another case testing the refusal by the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board or MSPB) to award attorney fees to a federal employee who has prevailed before the Board on the adverse action charge against him. 1 Before us, the Board asks that we remand the fee matter for reconsideration, while the Navy (the employing agency) seeks affirmance of the denial of fees. The employee asks outright reversal and award of fees. We agree with the Board, vacate its fee decision and remand to the Board.

I

Petitioner Thomson, a ship’s tank tester in the Philadelphia Navy Yard, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley Sterner v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Ez Paintr Corporation v. Padco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Jerome Yorkshire v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Martin D. Keely v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ole K. Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc. And Motorola Lighting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Harry L. Boese v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. John M. Van Fossen v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Edmund J. Massa, Jr. v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Michael T. Cuthbertson v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API