Ole K. Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc. And Motorola Lighting, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge RADER.
ORDER
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Motorola, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Motorola Lighting, Inc., (collectively “Motorola”) have moved to transfer the present appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for lack of appellate jurisdiction, asserting that the patent claims in the case were dismissed without prejudice by the district court and hence that we no longer had jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Nilssen has opposed the motion. Because the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Zenith Electronics Corporation, and Elo Touchsystems, Inc. v. Exzec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Donald D. Gronholz v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bernetta Hilbun v. David J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Typeright Keyboard Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.