Legal Opinion

In Re Howell

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 30, 1988No. Bankruptcy 86-01210-3P1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court upon the Debtors’ Motion for Cramdown against NCNB National Bank of Florida (“NCNB”) pursuant to § 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”). A hearing on the motion was held on March 10, 1988. Based upon the evidence presented and the argument of counsel, the Court finds that the Second Modification to the Debtors’ Amended Chapter 11 Plan does not comply with the applicable provisions of the Code and the Debtors’ Motion for Cramdown will therefore be denied.

Facts

On October 16, 1986, the Debtors filed a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. In Re Mastercraft Record Plating, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. Dade County School District v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. In Re S & W EnterpriseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Matter of PenrodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  3. Dolven v. Bartleson (In Re Bartleson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Goodnow v. Adelman (In Re Adelman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  5. In Re MercadoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API