Hillman v. Brigham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District 'Court. — IIon. William Hutchinson, Judge. Action in replevin to recover certain household goods. Plaintiff claims to have acquired title by purchase from one Boltz. Judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor, and. defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
1 The facts are that Boltz was a tenant of defendant Brigham, holding premises under a written lease; Brigham having a lien for rent on all property, not exempt from execution, which was kept, had, or used on the demised premises. The property in question was kept ■thereon.' The rent was in arrears, and, Boltz attempting to remove from the state,, a landlord’s writ of attachment was issued, and the property seized by defendant Davenport, who’ is sheriff. The present action was then, ’brought, plaintiff alleging that the property was exempt from ■execution, and that he purchased the same from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. Iowa City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Redfield v. StockerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. FindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Daniel v. HammersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Chorpening v. NickersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937