Legal Opinion

Roof v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1926No. A-5542PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Upon an information against R. D. Pike, John Roof, and Reed Roof, charging them with manufacturing intoxicating liquor, the defendant Pike pleaded guilty. Appellants were placed on trial, and a mistrial resulted. On their second trial the jury returned a verdict finding them guilty and fixing the punishment of each at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. To reverse the judgment they appeal.

A number of errors are assigned and argued, but one or two of which it is deemed necessary to notice:

That the court erred in overruling the defendants’ challenge to the special…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koontz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hisaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Harjo v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Wasy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. O'Leary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API