State v. . Floyd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The question for decision is whether error was committed in the following instruction to the jury: “When the killing is shown to be intentional and without legal provocation, and without just cause or excuse, or where the killing is shown to be done with a deadly weapon or in a cruel and brutal manner, then the law implies that it was done with malice.”
It is the position of the defendant that in a prosecution for murder in the first degree, the State must prove every element of the offense, S. v. Locklear, 118 N. C., 1154, 24 S. E., 410, and cannot avail itself .of the presumption of malice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . ChildressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . SneadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. McCluneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.