Legal Opinion
Edward D. Putty v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1955No. 13778PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Putty appeals from a conviction for conspiracy and theft of federal property, based on an information filed by the prosecuting attorney. He urges as his *474grounds of appeal (A) that he was tried on an information filed by the prosecuting attorney and was not granted the consideration of an impartial grand jury, and that at the time of the commission of the charged acts and at the time of his trial, Rules 7 and 6 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., made applicable by Congress to Guam, gave no power to its District Court to prosecute him except by indictment, unless…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RollinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Rainsberger v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. JuvenileDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
- United States v. MarshU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- Silvestrie C. Mafnas v. The Government of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.