Legal Opinion
Furey v. Saul
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-11514Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DENA MARIE FUREY, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * Civil Action No. 19-cv-11514-ADB ANDREW SAUL, * Commissioner of the Social Security * Administration, * * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Plaintiff Dena Marie Furey brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Currently pending are Ms. Furey’s motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.