Legal Opinion

Wunderlich v. Palmisano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1938No. 16618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This litigation results from an attempt by Edward Wunderlich to execute a judgment obtained by him against certain of the comakers of a promissory note of which he himself was one of the makers and which he had been required by the holder to pay. The comakers who, with Wunderlich, executed the note were Michael Wohlert, Miss Rosa Palmisano, and Paul John Grethel. Wunderlich, alleging that he had been required to pay the holder of the note the sum of $303.50, sought and obtained soli-dary judgment against the other said comakers for the said amount, with legal interest from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Lindquist v. Maurepas Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. Hunter v. LaurentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Swain v. SampsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NY v. ClemmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Thompson v. Bland Produce Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Johnson Contractors, Inc. v. Starbelt, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API