Richmond v. Freemans National Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Freemans National Bank, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Herkimer on the 8th day of September, 1902, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an order made at the Oneida Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Herkimer on the 8th day of September, 1902, granting plaintiffs an…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, The Freemans National Bank, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Herkimer on the 8th day of September, 1902, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an order made at the Oneida Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Herkimer on the 8th day of September, 1902, granting plaintiffs an additional allowance. ’
1Opinion of the Court
Spring, J. :
Plaintiffs, as executors, of the last will and testament of Alvin Richmond, deceased, were creditors to the extent of over $15,000 ■of Seth M. Richmond, who died on the 26th day of April, 1895; ' Seth M. Richmond left a last will and testament which was duly admitted to probate.in May, 1895, and letters testamentary thereon were issued to the executor Charles King by the surrogate of the county of Herkimer May sixth of that year.
Seth M. Richmond at the time of his death and for long before carried on a knitting mill manufactory under the name of the Saxony Knitting Mills Company,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- McRea v. Central National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Kingsland v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Platt v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cipperly v. LinkNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916