Legal Opinion

W. H. Neill Co. v. Rumpf

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 11, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

*811Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lassing —

Affirming.

W. H. Neill Company is a private, corporation, engaged in the mill supply business in the city of Louisville. It deals in belts, pulleys, wheels and all character of supplies used in the mill business. It is not a manufacturer, but simply a dealer. Its storeroom is situated on the north side of Main street between Fifth and Sixth, and runs back to an alley. The store is lighted in the rear by a large window. Harry Eumpf was a teamster, in the employ of A. H. Figg, who conducts a teaming and transfer business in the city of Louisville. About July…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Casualty Co. v. ElkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1947
  2. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Rein v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Gatliff Coal Co. v. Hill's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Auto Livery Company v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API