Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1951No. 32Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Douglas, joined by Justice Black agrees

It is worth emphasis that every patent case involving validity presents a question which requires reference to a standard written into the Constitution. Article I, § 8, contains a grant to the Congress of the power to permit patents to be issued. But, unlike most of the specific powers which Congress is given, that grant is qualified. The Congress does not have free rein, for example, to decide that patents should be easily or freely given. The Congress acts under the restraint imposed by the statement of purpose in Art. I, § 8. The purpose is “To promote the Progress of Science and useful…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API