Legal Opinion

United States v. Henri

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1987No. Nos. 85-3867, 85-3919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The government appeals from a district court judgment dismissing without prejudice its conversion suit against the Henri’s for lack of jurisdiction. The Henri’s cross appeal from statements made in the district court’s order which they claim are legally erroneous and argue that the government’s case should be dismissed with prejudice.

BACKGROUND

Although this case emerges from a fairly complex background, the facts relevant to this appeal can be stated simply. Henri authorized Burgess Construction Company to remove riprap1 from his unpatented Alaska mining claim during 1973 and 1974. The Bureau…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Michigan National Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  2. Isadora Shapiro, by and Through Her Parents Gary and Laurie Shapiro v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Digital Communications Network, Inc. v. AT & T Wireless ServicesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
  4. United States v. HenriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Dan Caputo Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API