Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Bean

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 2009No. 5-08-0062Published

1DissentJustice Stewart

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to recharacterize the defendant’s pro se petition as a postconviction petition. Accordingly, I would reverse the order of the circuit court dismissing the defendant’s petition and remand this cause with directions that the court recharacterize the petition, appoint counsel, and otherwise proceed with this matter under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act.

Prior to the adoption of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (the Act), an Illinois petitioner could attack his conviction by a writ of error, habeas corpus, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. The PEOPLE v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Marino v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. People v. JosephIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API