Legal Opinion
Zdrok v. v. Secret Catalogue, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 13, 2002No. Civ. 01-4282(WGB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
Defendants (referred to collectively in this Opinion as “Victoria’s Secret”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the following reasons, Victoria’s Secret’s motion to dismiss the Complaint is granted.
Victoria’s Secret has also filed a motion for sanctions, seeking an award of attorneys fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and under the Court’s inherent power. The Court concludes that Victoria’s Secret demonstrated that Plaintiff Victoria Zdrok’s (“Zdrok”) conduct was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SigmaPharm, Inc. v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Zdrok v. v Secret Catalogue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004