Fuller v. Missroon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
This was a rule on J. H. Heinsohn to show cause why he should not he required to complete his contract to purchase the premises ordered to be sold under decree of the court in the case of Sarah J. Fuller against Anna C. Missroon and others.
Read the full summary
This was a rule on J. H. Heinsohn to show cause why he should not he required to complete his contract to purchase the premises ordered to be sold under decree of the court in the case of Sarah J. Fuller against Anna C. Missroon and others. The decree of the Circuit Judge was as follows : The following extracts from the deed by Thomas Hanscome to Dr. Thomas Legaré, his heirs and assigns, dated 6th February, 1829, for the premises, the subject of this rule, state the consideration thereof and the trusts therein declared, viz.: “In consideration of the regard I have for Mrs. Ann Holmes, * * *…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court Avas delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
On the sixth day of February, 1829, Thomas Ilanscome, of the city of Charleston, executed his deed, whereby he conveyed unto Dr. Thomas Logan, his heirs and assigns forever, a certain house and lot, situate in Charleston County, upon the following trusts: “To suffer and permit Mrs. *321Ann Holmes and lier husband, for and during their joint lives, to occupy and enjoy said premises, or to receive the income thereof, and upon the death of either of said parties, viz., Mrs. Ann Holmes or her said husband, then in trust to suffer and permit…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Alderman v. AldermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Rogers v. ROGERSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- McMillan v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Lawrence v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Burnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.