Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Felker

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by the First National Bank of Cincinnati against W. R. Felker, doing business under the name and style of the Bank of Rogers.

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

At the time plaintiff purchased the several drafts and bills of lading, it was undeniably true that the drafts and the cans covered by the bills of lading were the absolute property of the United States Can Company. That company could have shipped them anywhere and sold them on any terms and to anybody it saw’ fit, and neither the Rogers Canning Company, nor any one else, had any legal right to complain. When the plaintiff purchased from the United States Can Company the drafts and bills of lading, it is undeniably, true that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Landa v. Lattin Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Semmes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Finch v. . GreggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Gregg v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Market State Bank v. Farmers Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Quigley v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. Danzas, Ltd. v. National Bank of AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API