Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. O'CONNELL

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 1, 1978No. Civ. A. 65-C-173PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER (Including Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law)

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

The Court hereby finds, for the reasons stated below, that the defendants discriminated against the plaintiffs with segregative intent, as further specified below, and in so doing violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

I. Introduction

On January 19, 1976, the Court concluded that Milwaukee public “school authorities engaged in practices with the intent and for the purpose of creating and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kevin Armstrong v. Board Of School Directors Of The City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Armstrong v. Board of School DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Yonkers Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Armstrong v. BOARD OF SCH. DIRECTORS, ETC.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Armstrong v. O'CONNELLDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API