Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1982No. 80-02689, CA A22799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The issues in this worker’s compensation case are 1) whether claimant’s epididymitis is compensable and 2) if so, whether the period for which temporary total disability was awarded was correctly assessed.

Claimant was injured in a car accident November 30, 1979, while he and his employer were traveling to a job site. He was thrown from the vehicle and suffered multiple contusions and bruises to the hip and back area. The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) accepted responsibility for medical treatment resulting from those injuries but denied that claimant’s epididymitis was causally related…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Taylor v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Miller v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Hedlund v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Vader v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coastal Farm Supply v. HultbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Bracke v. Baza'r, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API