Legal Opinion
Boenzle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1953No. 28638, 28641PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
258 S.W.2d 938 (1953)
BOENZLE
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO.
Nos. 28638, 28641.
St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri.
June 16, 1953.
Rehearing Denied July 10, 1953.
H. Chouteau Dyer, Pevely, J. Raymond Dyer, St. Louis, for appellant.
Roberts & Roberts, Raymond S. Roberts, Farmington, for respondents.
HOUSER, Commissioner.
This is an action on an automobile insurance policy which obligated the defendants, under
"Coverage D-Comprehensive Loss of or Damage to the Automobile, Except by Collision or UpsetTo pay for any direct and accidental loss of or damage to the automobile, hereinafter called…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Weller v. Hayes Truck LinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Bouse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Catron v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Schultz v. Queen Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kallash v. KuelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Terrell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Irelan v. Standard Mutual Association of CassvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.