Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 4, 2004No. 03-60703-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HUCK, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court for a ruling on the issues presented during a bench trial held from April 26 to 30, 2004. In this patent infringement action, the crux of the Plaintiffs’ case relies on their suggestion that one of the ingredients, mi-crocrystalline cellulose, in the Defendants’ proposed medicinal tablet formulations can be divided into two portions, one portion of which functions actively as a binder and disintegrant and a second portion of which acts passively as a filler. The Court finds, largely on the ground that…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cedant v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  2. Porras v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API