Arispe v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Jim Wells County; V. W. Taylor, Judge. Action between Celso Arispe and others and- Forrest Clark and others. From the judgment, Arispe and others appeal.'
1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.
The appellants have not filed briefs in this court, and appellees 1\⅜>⅛ filed a brief which is not in compliance with rule 42 for the Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xiv). The judgment cannot be affirmed, but the appeal will be dismissed. In order for the appellees to have been entitled to an affirmance of the judgment, the case should have been briefed by them as provided in the rule cited. Suderman & Dolson v. Carson, 122 S. W. 401; Bowman v. Hoffman, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 311, 67 S. W. 152; American Warehouse Co. v. Hamblen, 146 S. W. 1006; S. W. Oil & Gas Co. v. Denny, 187 S. W. 973;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dorman v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- American Warehouse Co. v. HamblenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Bowman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Southwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Stocking v. LaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edwards v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919