Legal Opinion

Ola Belle Meredith v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1964No. 18640_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

On motion for summary judgment the district court held that the acts and omissions upon which appellant based her action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, occurred in Bangkok, Thailand; and that suit under the Act was therefore barred by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2680 (k), which excludes from the coverage of the Act “any claim arising in a foreign country.” Appellant contends that her claim did not arise “in a foreign country” because the significant acts and omissions occurred within the physical confines of the American Embassy at Bangkok.

Appel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. SpelarSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Martin John Beattie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. John D. McKeel Jr. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Clifton S. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Heller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Donahue v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API