Fisher v. Bullington
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
This case was argued and submitted heretofore for a decision by this Court, and was remanded to the lower court for the purpose of allowing the introduction of evidence on the question of whether plaintiff had knowledge of the intention of Cole, the purchaser of the car involved, to remove the same from the State of Illinois, wherein the sale was consummated and wherein conditional sales law is in effect. The question, on second trial, was answered in the affirmative by admission of counsel. That is, that plaintiff knew Cole intended to take the car into the State of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Overland Texarkana Co. v. BickleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Packard Florida Motors Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Finance Security Co. v. MexicLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. Victor Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- American Slicing Machine Co. v. Rothschild & LyonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- May Finance Co. v. NagyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hub City Motors, Inc. v. BrockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- In re Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971