Legal Opinion

United States v. Shawndale L. Jamison

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 05-1045PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Shawndale Jamison appeals his sentence on the ground that it violates the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. Since Jamison had fair warning of the possible penalties for his actions, we find that his sentence passes muster under ex post facto and due process principles and affirm.

Background

In 2004, Jamison was indicted on four counts of distributing cocaine base. He pled guilty to count one of the indictment and admitted that his total offense conduct was at least two grams, but less than three grams of cocaine base. The probation officer summarized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald Craig ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. United States v. Derek A. Vaughn, Zaza Leslie LindoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Donald DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. MixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API