Legal Opinion
Freiberger v. O'Toole
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
(orally). There are before me two proceedings brought by Edward H. Freiberger, as petitioner, as against Donald L. O’Toole and others, to invalidate purported nominations of Donald L. O’Toole as a candidate for the office of congressman in the 12th Congressional District. These are nominations of the Democratic party and the Liberal party.
It appears without question that one of the necessary parties to that proceeding is Donald L. O’Toole, since he is a person who would be directly affected by any determination made in the proceeding. The case of Matter of Rosenberg v. Gralla (296 N. Y. 623,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of King v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Matter of ConstantinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of Serri v. HeffernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Matter of Rosenberg v. GrallaNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Serri v. HeffernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Welch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Butler v. GargiuloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Rose Associates v. BernsteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Hsu v. Emerson Collision, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Freiberger v. O'TooleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.