Legal Opinion

Novak v. Zastrow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The defendant and his wife live in the city of Monroe. On the 19th day of November, 1928, his wife drove to Madison in his automobile to bring her mother to the Zastrow home. On the way back from Madison there was a collision between the car of plaintiff and the car driven by Mrs. Zastrow. The verdict of the jury found facts upon which the plaintiff was entitled to recover if Mrs. Zastrow was the agent of the defendant in driving the car, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Al-' though the sufficiency of the evidence establishing the facts upon which liability is predicated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Enea v. PfisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Borger v. McKeithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurn v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Le Sage v. Le SageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cochran v. AllynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Laurent v. PlainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Burant v. StudzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API