Legal Opinion

Burant v. Studzinski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The defendant Barney Studzinski owns the truck that was being driven by his son Richard on June 14, 1936, the time when the injury to the plaintiff occurred. Richard used the truck to take his mother, his sister, and a girl living with the family to> church at Polonia, about five miles from the home of Barney Studzinski.

So far as Richard’s case is concerned the evidence sustains the findings made by the jury holding him guilty of seventy-five per cent of the negligence, and the judgment against him must stand. Whether or not Barney Studzinski is responsible for the damages is a different…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Zeidler v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Crossett v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Zurn v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Philip v. SchlagerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Houlahan v. BrockmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Hanson v. EngebretsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Borkenhagen v. BaertschiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API