Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Decamp Bus Lines, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 19, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDMAN, J.S.C.
Plaintiff, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1317 (Local 1317), and defendant, De Camp Bus Lines, Inc., (DeCamp), are parties to a collective bargaining agreement. Local 1317 brought this action to confirm an arbitration award in favor of Rinaldo Torres (Torres), a bus driver DeCamp had suspended. Four years earlier Torres had been robbed at gunpoint while driving a bus and suffered from post-traumatic stress syndrome. In April of *4202004, a $33,000 settlement of his workers compensation case was proposed. DeCamp suspended Torres, claiming that the medical evidence justifying…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 880 v. Njt Bus Operations, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006