Legal Opinion

Dinuzzo v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1909No. 16,330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Abraham L. Sutton, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Tlie question for determination in this case is the validity of the daylight saloon act. In a prosecution by the *352state in the district court for Douglas county, defendant Frank Dinuzzo, a licensed saloon-keeper in the city of Omaha, Avas convicted of selling and giving aAvay malt and spirituous liquors after 8 o’clock P. M., July 10, 1909, in violation of the act mentioned. For that offense he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100, and he now presents the record of his conviction for review by a petition in error.

Defendant assails the sentence of the trial court on the sole ground that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Territory of Dakota v. WebsterSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Griffin v. GassNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Marsh & Marsh, Inc. v. CarmichaelNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Driscoll v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. BadbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API