Legal Opinion

Rivard v. Director of the Division of Employment Security

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 27, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In this appeal by a claimant for unemployment compensation benefits, we are presented with the questions whether a person whose employment was barred by statute, because of his own act, may nevertheless receive unemployment compensation when the employer, realizing the statutory prohibition, ceased to employ the claimant. In the terms of G. L. c. 151A, § 25 (e) (1), may benefits be denied to such a person because he left his job “voluntarily”? At least in the circumstance of this case, we conclude that a *529person who causes the statutory impediment that bars his employment leaves his employment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Harvard Student Agencies, Inc. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Clarksdale v. Mississippi Emp. SEC. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. LeBeau v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Olmeda v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Scannevin v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi v. Theodore R. HawkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API