Legal Opinion

Earle v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 12, 1996No. C 95-20205 JWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WARE, District Judge.

The Court has before it the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment. Based upon all pleadings filed to date, as well as on the oral argument of counsel, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion and GRANTS Defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Eyvind and Joan Earle (“the Earles”) filed this action in state court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for an alleged tortious breach of a liability insurance policy. The Earles claim that Defendant State Farm Fire &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Associated International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Felice v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miletak v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API