Legal Opinion

Prince v. Forman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1938No. 12435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

The proceedings ante-dating and producing this appeal are these: the Attorney General of the State filed suit in the court below against the Lloyds of Texas, the individual subscribers and their attorneys in fact to wind up the affairs of the exchange on the ground that it was insolvent, and as an ancillary remedy sought the appointment of a receiver. On May 16, 1930 the court below appointed W. D. Prince receiver, with full authority to take charge of all assets of the exchange, collect past-due accounts, and, as ordered by the court from time to time, to do and perform other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forman v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Beacon Oil & Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Lloyds of Texas v. BobbittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Lloyds of Texas v. BobbittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex parte GriffittsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hill Culpepper v. Martha Culpepper, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API