Legal Opinion

Forman v. Prince

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1936No. 12264PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

■ On May 26, 1934, W. D. Prince, appellee, in his capacity as receiver of Lloyds of Texas, filed suit against Frank Forman, *1003appellant, in a district court of Dallas county, to recover on the latter’s subscription note in the sum of $3,000, title to certain securities, and, in the alternative, to foreclose the pledgee’s lien thereon. The note sued upon is as follows:

“Subscription Note Number #- “Amount $3000.00
“Lloyds of Texas Dallas Texas
“For value received, on demand, I promise to pay to Thomas Investment Co., or their successors, as Attorney-in-Fact, of Lloyds of Texas, at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. H. C. Burt & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Miller v. FramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Beckwith v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BainTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  2. Bates v. StinnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Harvey v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. BaezaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Gifford-Hill & Co. v. Hearne Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API