Legal Opinion

Barclay Brass & Aluminum Foundry, Inc. v. Resnick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Did the court err in denying plaintiffs election to take judgment for the value of the property rather than for possession?

Sec. 270.59, Stats., provides:

“In any action of replevin judgment for the plaintiff may be for the possession or for the recovery of possession of the property . . . and when the property shall have been delivered to the defendant, under section 265.06, judgment may be as aforesaid or absolutely for the value thereof at the plaintiff’s option, and damages for the detention. . . .”

Sec. 265.06, Stats., provides:

“At any time before the delivery of the property to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. DoolittleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brewster v. CarmichaelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Dresser v. LemmaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Klinkert v. Fulton Storage & Mercantile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Barney v. DouglassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. Adamatic, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Power Transmission Equipment Corp. v. Beloit Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Korb v. SchroedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bakley v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API