Legal Opinion

Woolford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2001No. ED 78254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

Oscar Wilde feared that modern man knew the cost of everything, but the value of nothing. In this case, we encounter a witness who seemingly knew neither cost nor value, and, as a consequence, we cannot affirm the felony stealing conviction that rested upon that witness’s indefinite testimony on the crucial question of value. Although we cannot affirm Defendant’s conviction for theft of property valued at $750.00 or more, we do affirm our commitment to a higher value: that no person may stand convicted absent substantial proof of each element of a charged offense.

Defe…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SpearSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. EcfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. CalicotteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API