Legal Opinion

DOE v. PINE-RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00051Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-51 v. Hon. William S. Stickman IV PINE-RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge The Constitution does not give federal courts the authority to decide issues, no matter how timely and important. Article II of the Constitution confers upon the courts of the United States only the authority to decide cases and controversies. U.S. Const. Art. HI. Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Doe”), a parent of a child enrolled in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API