Winslow v. McCarthy
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, setting aside judgments.. E. P. Shortall, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.
The above actions were brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained on July 18, 1915, when the two -plaintiffs were riding in an automobile as passengers. The defendant, H. B. McCarthy, was at the time driving the automobile in what is commonly called “jitney service.” While the plaintiffs were in the automobile it collided with a street-car, and as a result of the collision, the plaintiffs were severely injured and McCarthy sustained injuries from which he later became insane.
The actions were commenced in October, 1915, and the Pacific Coast…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kallman v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Luigi Marre Land & Cattle Co. v. RosesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.