Kinsey v. Locomobile Co. of America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 178 and 179, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 2669, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Sherman Kinsey, by his father and next friend, John H. Kinsey and John H. Kinsey v. The Locomobile Company of America. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 178 and 179, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 2669, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Sherman Kinsey, by his father and next friend, John H. Kinsey and John H. Kinsey v. The Locomobile Company of America. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000. On motion for judgment for defendant n. o. v. Carr, J., filed the following opinion: The defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto presents two questions: the duty which the…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee C deiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court •below refusing a new trial and judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. MauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Baker v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.