Legal Opinion

Bard v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 30, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Sandidge—

Affirming.

Appellant, Nathan Bard, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the Hopkins circuit court convicting him of the crime of rape and fixing his penalty at death by hanging. He, Bunyan Fleming and Columbus Hollis had been jointly indicted but separate trials were had.

His contention that, the demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained is without merit. The point made for him is that the indictment was not good because it charged him with the offense named both as principal as an aider and abetter of others named, who also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Logsdon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Bethel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Burnam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Shivley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Bailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. George v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API